What are the different types of AI agents?

In our previous blog post, AI Agents: Automating Everything to Transforming the Way We Work, we uncovered the world of AI agents for you. We explained how AI agents stand apart from generative AI tools and how agents can supercharge productivity. But that’s not all. There are different types of AI agents that come with varying levels of capabilities and complexities. When simplicity, scalability, efficiency, and affordability are your criteria, you should take a closer look at the different types of agents.  

Types of AI Agents

AI agents operate through three essential components: perception, reasoning, and action. 

Perception is the ability to gather and interpret data from diverse environments, whether physical or virtual. For instance, an AI agent might analyze an annual business performance report or process a meeting recording. It seamlessly handles data in various formats from multiple sources. 

Reasoning involves analyzing this data to extract meaningful insights. AI agents excel at identifying patterns within vast datasets and forecasting future outcomes, enabling smarter decisions. Using the reasoning, agents execute tasks. AI agents act with complete autonomy or semi-autonomy in executing tasks based on the insights to achieve goals. 

Based on the ability of AI agents to perceive, reason and execute tasks, we can categorize them as simple reflex agents, model-based reflex agents, goal-based agents, utility-based agents, learning agents, hierarchical agents, and multi-agent systems (MAS). Reflex agents work on a set of predefined condition-action rules and do not show autonomy. Goal- and utility-based agents and learning agents are cognitive and adaptive. You can orchestrate these agents together, either in a hierarchy or a multi-agent system, to work together towards a common goal. 

Let’s explore each type of AI agents in detail. 

Simple reflex agents

Simple reflex agents are the most straightforward type of AI agent. They act purely based on predefined condition-action rules, meaning they respond directly to specific stimuli without considering the broader context or past events. For instance, if you ask such an agent how to reset your PIN, it might identify the keyword “reset PIN” and fetch the relevant FAQ or knowledge articles. 

These agents are simple, predictable, and easy to implement. They consume minimal computing power and are highly cost-effective. However, simple agents lack the ability to learn and adapt to changes in the environment. For workflows requiring an agent to work beyond the predefined rules, simple reflex agents are not suitable. 

Benefits: 

• Simplicity: Easy to implement and manage due to their straightforward rule-based approach. 

• Cost-effectiveness: Minimal computing power required, making them highly economical. 

• Reliability: Their predictability ensures consistent outcomes for simple tasks. 

Limitations: 

• Lack of learning: These agents cannot adapt to changes or learn from past actions. 

• Static rules: Limited to predefined actions, making them unsuitable for dynamic or complex workflows. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Customer support: Automating responses for frequently asked questions to reduce support staff workload. 

• Accounts payable: Matching invoice keywords with predefined templates for validation. 

• HR onboarding: Providing instant answers to routine queries about policies or procedures. 

Model-based reflex agents

Model-based reflex agents take a step forward by maintaining an internal model of their environment. This model includes details such as the current state, possible actions, and potential outcomes. Using this information, these agents select the most appropriate action based on predefined rules and update their model after executing an action. 

These agents address the key challenge with simple reflex agents: the lack of memory. By maintaining an internal representation, they can make better decisions in dynamic environments with partial observability. 

Benefits: 

• Improved decision-making: Can handle partially observable environments by referencing their internal model. 

• Context awareness: Adapt to dynamic environments better than simple reflex agents. 

• Enhanced responsiveness: Update their internal models based on the present state, improving future actions. 

Limitations: 

• Complexity: Requires more computational resources and development effort compared to simple reflex agents. 

• Static rules: Still limited to predefined decision-making rules without learning capabilities. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Inventory management: Adjusting reorder levels based on current stock and demand forecasts. 

• Compliance monitoring: Evaluating regulatory inputs dynamically to ensure ongoing adherence. 

• Facilities management: Updating maintenance schedules based on real-time sensor data. 

Goal-based agents

Goal-based agents operate with specific objectives in mind. Unlike reflex agents, they evaluate future consequences of their actions to determine the best way to achieve their goals. These agents are suitable for environments that require strategic planning and adaptability. 

Reflex agents, whether simple- or model-based, are reactive in nature and react to immediate stimuli. They do not possess the intelligence required to consider future consequences to evaluate possible actions for desired outcomes. Goal-based agents are more sophisticated and capable of devising and executing strategic actions to achieve specific objectives. They continuously evaluate the current state against their goals and adjust their actions to ensure they achieve the goals. 

To leverage the full potential of goal-based agents, you must ensure the perfect balance between the complexity of goals and the possibilities for misalignment. 

Benefits: 

• Strategic thinking: Capable of long-term planning to meet objectives. 

• Adaptability: Adjust actions dynamically to align with changing goals. 

• Complex problem solving: Handles multifaceted challenges effectively by focusing on outcomes. 

Limitations: 

• Resource intensive: Requires significant computing power for evaluating potential outcomes. 

• Complex implementation: Needs clearly defined goals and extensive programming. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Financial planning: Analyzing multiple investment options to maximize returns. 

• Project management: Adjusting project timelines and resources dynamically to meet strategic goals. 

• Procurement: Prioritizing supplier negotiations to meet cost and quality objectives. 

Utility-based agents

Utility-based agents enhance goal-based agents by considering the quality of outcomes. They use a utility function to assign numerical values to possible outcomes, choosing actions that maximize overall utility. These agents are particularly effective when trade-offs or uncertainties are involved. 

Goal-based agents are all about reaching a specific target, but they’re not exactly picky about how they get there. For example, if you ask one to find a restaurant, it’ll give you a place that serves food, but it won’t factor in things like how close it is, how much it costs, or whether the food’s even good. 

Enter utility-based agents: the perfectionists of the AI world. These agents don’t just aim for the goal; they optimize every step to make sure the outcome is worth it. They balance trade-offs, navigate uncertainties, and use a clever utility function to assign a numerical value to each outcome based on how desirable it is. Then, they pick the action with the highest utility, constantly updating their calculations as they go. Think of them as your personal strategist, making sure every choice adds up to the best possible result. 

Benefits: 

• Outcome optimization: Focus on achieving the most desirable results. 

• Trade-off management: Balances competing priorities effectively. 

• Decision flexibility: Adjusts dynamically to maximize utility in uncertain environments. 

Limitations: 

• Complex utility functions: Requires careful design to ensure accurate optimization. 

• High computational demand: Evaluating multiple scenarios can be resource-intensive. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Sales forecasting: Weighing market trends, customer behavior, and historical data to refine predictions. 

• Expense management: Prioritizing budget allocation to maximize ROI. 

• IT resource allocation: Optimizing server usage based on workload patterns. 

Learning agents

Learning agents can improve their performance over time. They start with basic knowledge and refine their decision-making by learning from data, identifying patterns, and adapting to new circumstances. These agents continually update their strategies based on past experiences and environmental feedback. 

Utility-based agents are static optimizers, which means they optimize outcomes within predefined conditions but do not adapt to changing conditions. For example, a learning agent predicts the optimal amount of stock to order using a fixed logic that counts current demand and lead times. However, if the demand suddenly changes, the agent will still use the fixed logic and give inaccurate predictions. Utility-based agents do not learn from their past mistakes. 

On the other hand, learning agents start with small sets of data and basic knowledge. As you continue to use them, learning agents collect data, identify patterns, learn from their past experiences, and refine decisions to achieve the desired outcomes. From the previous example, learning agents consider consumer behavior, seasonal trends, and competitor pricing to adjust their pricing to maximize profit. 

Benefits: 

• Continuous improvement: Learns and adapts to changing conditions over time. 

• Flexibility: Capable of handling complex, dynamic environments. 

• Error reduction: Learns from mistakes to improve future actions. 

Limitations: 

• Data dependency: Requires large volumes of quality data for effective learning. 

• Development effort: Needs sophisticated algorithms and training processes. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Demand forecasting: Continuously refining demand predictions based on seasonality and market behavior. 

• Fraud detection: Learning from transaction patterns to identify and prevent fraud. 

• Employee training: Adapting learning paths based on employee progress and performance metrics. 

Hierarchical agents

Hierarchical agents function within a structured system, where AI agents at different levels collaborate to achieve broad organizational goals. At the top, strategic planner agents define goals and share plans with mid-level coordinators, who then allocate tasks to low-level execution agents. The coordinators also monitor the performance of the execution agents and adjust their tasks as needed. 

In a business environment, you set long-term and short-term strategies and goals at the organization or department level. You can use the help of hierarchical agents organized in a well-defined, centralized structure to execute these strategies and achieve your goals. 

At each level, the agents monitor and control the performance of lower-level agents and ensure proper execution of tasks toward your goals. Hierarchical AI agents are highly scalable and allow you to manage complex tasks effectively by breaking them down into manageable layers. Hierarchical agents at each level are adaptable to changing environments and adjust their actions based on new data or goals. You can deploy specialized, autonomous agents at each level to perform specific tasks and ensure higher efficiency of the system with minimal human intervention. 

Benefits: 

• Scalability: Handles complex, multi-layered tasks efficiently. 

• Specialization: Each level focuses on specific tasks, improving efficiency. 

• Adaptability: Adjusts actions dynamically at each level based on new data. 

Limitations: 

• Dependency: Failure at higher levels can disrupt the entire system. 

• Complex management: Requires careful coordination and monitoring. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Corporate strategy: Breaking down strategic goals into departmental tasks. 

• Order fulfilment: Ensuring smooth operations across procurement, warehousing, and shipping layers. 

• IT infrastructure: Managing software updates, patches, and server maintenance across levels. 

Multi-agent systems (MAS)

Multi-agent systems consist of independent agents working together toward a shared goal. Unlike hierarchical structures, operate without a rigid command chain, making them flexible and responsive to changing environments. Each agent operates autonomously, collaborating effortlessly with others through open communication—no chain of command required. 

Each agent makes its decisions based on data received from other agents and its own goals and percept inputs. While executing tasks, an agent might collaborate with other agents and influence their tasks or goals. The autonomy of each agent gives the multi-agent system great scalability and flexibility to handle larger processes and more complex challenges. Unlike hierarchical agents, the failure of one agent will not impact the entire system. These agents can adapt to changing environments and coordinate with other agents accordingly. 

Benefits: 

• Resilience: Failure of one agent doesn’t affect the entire system. 

• Scalability: Easily handles large-scale, complex processes. 

• Flexibility: Autonomous agents can adapt their actions dynamically. 

Limitations: 

• Coordination challenges: Requires efficient communication and conflict resolution mechanisms. 

• Complex design: Developing autonomous agents with collaborative capabilities can be challenging. 

Use cases in business operations: 

• Supply chain coordination: Facilitating communication between suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors. 

• Financial analysis: Enabling decentralized analysis of financial data across teams. 

• Crisis management: Collaborating on emergency response strategies across multiple departments. 

How to choose the right type of AI agents?

Different type of AI agents offers diverse capabilities to meet different business needs. You need to understand their capabilities and limitations to choose the right type of agent for your use cases. However, in most cases, the line between these agents is so thin that you must understand the nuances to make the right decision. This is where most businesses find it challenging. Feeling the same? Don’t worry. 

Take the help of a trusted technology partner like Saxon AI, who can help you with comprehensive AI agent services – from consulting to implementation and management. Our AI experts help you gain fresh perspectives on AI agents, uncover unconventional ways to leverage their potential, and maximize value from your AI investment. 

Get in touch with us